Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 25, 2025, 4:40 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!
#87
RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!
(May 3, 2017 at 8:59 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:
(May 3, 2017 at 8:10 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: Didn't Swedenborg describe the aliens living on other planets?  Must be them.

Yes, he did, in "Life on Other Earths." It is heavily laden with alchemical symbolism, something the reader should always keep in mind. Nevertheless, I do not consider myself a true Swedenborgian; but rather, a student of his work, which I find fascinating and insightful though not necessarily authoritative. This does not undermine my point that his uncanny predictions and incidents of clairvoyance are documented facts.

This is for instance what Swedenborg "discovered" clairvoyance from "Concerning the earths in our solar system, which are called planets Concerning the earths in our solar system, which are called planets":

It was declared to me by the angels, that the most ancient people on this earth lived in like manner as the inhabitants of the planet Jupiter, viz. that they were distinguished into nations, families, and houses, and that all at that time were content with their own possessions;

I guess it would be a miracle that there are still people that think there is any merit to Swedenborg even at this day and age, but let's face it when it comes to Christians no matter how stupid and erroneous something is, they'll still believe it.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fake Messiah - May 10, 2017 at 7:43 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why is Jesus Circumcised and not the rest of the christians ? Megabullshit 25 12084 May 13, 2025 at 8:23 am
Last Post: awty
  Science and Theism Doesn't Work out right? Hellomate1234 28 4941 November 7, 2024 at 8:12 am
Last Post: syntheticadrenaline
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 13415 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Why do psychologists need religion? Interaktive 17 3567 May 16, 2021 at 11:47 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Atheists: I have tips of advice why you are a hated non religious dogmatic group inUS Rinni92 13 5066 August 5, 2020 at 3:43 pm
Last Post: Sal
  Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist John V 99 27995 November 8, 2017 at 9:28 pm
Last Post: Martian Mermaid
  Why atheism is important, and why religion is dangerous causal code 20 11433 October 17, 2017 at 4:42 pm
Last Post: pocaracas
  Do you think Science and Religion can co-exist in a society? ErGingerbreadMandude 137 52677 June 10, 2017 at 3:21 pm
Last Post: comet
  Why Science and religious faith are in conflict. Jehanne 28 10578 May 1, 2017 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Let us think why humanity developed several religions but only one science? Nishant 10 4322 January 4, 2017 at 1:42 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)