RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!
May 10, 2017 at 4:40 pm
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2017 at 4:41 pm by Fake Messiah.)
(May 10, 2017 at 8:40 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: I must give you credit for managing to fit 3 logical fallacies in less than a paragraph. First, you try to invalidate my replies with an ad hominen.
Yeah these words don't contain much weight coming from a guy that thinks Swedenborg was clairvoyant. You should probably look at your own "ad hominen", because, for starters, it's written ad hominem. It doesn't always mean that if something is ad hominem attack that it is wrong, especially when person in question thinks Swedenborg was right and Charles Darwin was wrong.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
