Earth to Trump -- Fuck You!!

[Anomalocaris]

Okay, then the answer is stricter regulation and tougher agreements.  Right?  So that it does "enough"?

People -are- demanding alternative energy and clean cars or more public transport to reduce the number of cars.....Alpha..............that's what you and your boy are actively obstructing.  In fact, the world.. is demanding it ( you know..minus us and syria......).  That's what the Paris Accord was.

And it wasn't much.
http://news.mit.edu/2016/how-much-differ...-make-0422

Assuming a climate system response to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions that’s of median strength, the three scenarios reduce the SAT in 2100 between 0.6 and 1.1 C relative to the “no climate policy” case. But because the climate system takes many years to respond to emissions reductions, in 2050 the SAT falls by only about 0.1 C in all three cases. Meanwhile, the rise in SAT since preindustrial times exceeds 2 C in 2053, and in 2100, reaches between 2.7 and 3.6 C — far exceeding the 2 C goal.

So, apparently you guys don't think the world will come to an end with a rise between 2.7 and 3.6 degrees, or you'd be demanding a lot more. 

Or, the Paris accords were mostly intended to make you think that something serious was being done, and you didn't care to really look into it.

The world really wouldn't come to an end if we eat all the Christian babies. So there is really no justification for us to eat fewer Christian babies.