(June 24, 2017 at 6:04 pm)Minimalist Wrote: True, but what he does not seem to grasp is that what is needed is a manuscript which predates Eusebius, as after that only Eusebius' copies of Josephus survive. They could have written Wonder Woman in the later manuscripts and it wouldn't make fuckall of a difference to the original Josephan text.
It's a pity no unadulterated copies lasted all the way. We do know of their existence at the 10th century, for Photius I patriarch of Constantinople mentions owning original Aramaic copies of Josephus' works and specifically saying they didn't mention Jesus (castigating Eusebius for his forgeries), and a scholar as recent as Erasmus (IIRC) also mentioned Hebrew copies of Josephus copied directly from originals which made no mention of Jesus.
We're really only a few hundred years out of being able to have definitive proof of Eusebius' forgeries.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home