(July 9, 2017 at 4:49 am)Dropship Wrote: Thanks, but it's not just Flew who says God can be "seen" in the maths, it's other scientists too, so we're caught in the middle not knowing whether to believe them or not.
For example here are a couple more quotes-
"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that [b]a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature."-Fred Hoyle (British astrophysicist): The Universe: Past and Present Reflections. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics: 20:16.
Well consideting that outside his very narrow competency within physics, Hoyle managed to back any bullshit going, how do you think he was any different wrt god? I mean this is the man who equated evolution with a tornado in a junkyard assembling a 747, the man who said the Big Bang was wrong simply because he didn't like it (he coined the name trying to knock it).
Quote:"As we survey all the evidence, the thought insistently arises that some supernatural agency - or, rather, Agency - must be involved. Is it possible that suddenly, without intending to, we have stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence of a Supreme Being? Was it God who stepped in and so providentially crafted the cosmos for our benefit?"- George Greenstein (astronomer),1988. The Symbiotic Universe. New York: William Morrow, p.27
Oh, well done you, you know how to quote mine. Here's a gold star for your effort.
![[Image: ?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.com%2Fr...ap.gif&f=1]](https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.com%2Fr%2F2012%2F09%2Forson_wells_Slow-Clap.gif&f=1)
Actually, no, I rescind that gold star, it isn't even well disguised quote mining. Even taken out of the context of the book in which it was written, it is obvious that what you've presented to us here is a couple of rhetorical questions designed solely to mock idiots like you who rabbit on about how "science proves god". Pity then that you're a fucking piece of shit who has to resort to lying and quote mining to try to support your case, rather than a genuine and honest search for any evidence which may either prove or disprove your case.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home