Typical theists versus typical atheists

[Mister Agenda]

I am just a man who had the chance to live the unconditional love towards all others. So no one in the world can force me have any sort of enemy in my life. If someone has enemies he can keep them for himself and his followers if any. I prefer to die than live even one second of fear of any sort.

You come off as condescending and passive-aggressive.

But on the other hand, those who are born of flesh only should be selfish because by being so they can better serve the world as each of them is supposed (pre-programmed) to do.

Is that your supposed unconditional love shining through?

By the way, why, in Jesus story, Jesus was condemned to death? Was is it for telling lies or truths?
If Jesus was telling lies, why all men on power (claimed being Christian or else) allowed the printings of his lies for about 2000 years so far.
Actually, he was condemned for telling the masses about truths concerning the real world; truths that shouldn't be heard by people who are supposed to be guided by rules of a system (claimed being religious or political, if not both).

Actually, it was for conspiracy against Rome and challenging Caesar by calling himself a King. Whether the accusations were warranted is anyone's guess.

I guess now, it is clear that, in general, theists and atheists differ just in their loyalty.

Nearly any blanket statement about theists and atheists other than the former believe at least one god or God is real and the latter don't; is bound to be an over-simplistic hasty generalization. It's clear that, in general, the atheists in this thread care about whether what they believe is justified by evidence and reason.

A theist is loyal to certain representatives of a god and/or representatives of human ideals and, therefore, support their approved stories (in history or the present ones)
An atheist is loyal to certain representatives of human ideals only and believe their approved stories (also in history and the present ones) if they are well presented and proven on their electrical monitors.

You're claiming that atheists (all atheists, apparently) are guilty of scientism. You assert that without evidence or any support whatsoever, and such an assertion isn't worth the time it took to read it.

It happens that it is out of question for me to be loyal to any specific ruling system (I guess you know why).

You're whimsical?

By the way, I didn't get married because a healthy marriage needs a third party representing a certain authority (religious or civil) to approve it, if not to bless it too   Automatically, when someone is married, he became loyal to the system that blessed his marriage otherwise his marriage would become a fake one. So I am here because my father, unlike I, didn't mind getting the permission of the Catholic Church first and live, therefore, as a good Catholic should do in order to give me the chance to exist.

So you've volunteered yourself out of the gene pool to avoid paperwork. All I can say is thanks.

Finally, I understand very well anytime someone says something like: Kerim, as presented here, doesn't exist
Indeed, Kerim cannot exist in the reality of many people as any ruling god cannot exist in Kerim's reality.

Did someone say that?

[quote=Mister Agenda]
I am disappoint.

I used presenting who I am and saying what I have in mind in order to find out if I have missed something to know that some others had the chance to witness personally.

Did you never consider forthrightly asking questions and respectfully examining the answers you were given?

It seems my sincerity just upsets people here. And, for some reasons, they can't be sincere as I am. Fortunately, some of them enjoy replying me using innovative unfriendly expressions. This is better than nothing.

Keep telling yourself that it's your sincerity that bugs people if it helps you feel better about what you post.