Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 16, 2025, 12:25 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supposed Int design proof
#19
RE: Supposed Int design proof
I drilled down the source, he's not discussing any geometric center of the universe, the full quote

Quote:That is, we live in one universe, so we're a sample of one. With a sample of one, you have what is called a large sample variance. And maybe this just means we're lucky, that we just happen to live in a universe where the number's smaller than you'd predict. But when you look at CMB map, you also see that the structure that is observed, is in fact, in a weird way, correlated with the plane of the earth around the sun. Is this Copernicus coming back to haunt us? That's crazy. We're looking out at the whole universe. There's no way there should be a correlation of structure with our motion of the earth around the sun — the plane of the earth around the sun — the ecliptic. That would say we are truly the center of the universe.

The new results are either telling us that all of science is wrong and we're the center of the universe, or maybe the data is imply incorrect, or maybe it's telling us there's something weird about the microwave background results and that maybe, maybe there's something wrong with our theories on the larger scales. And of course as a theorist I'm certainly hoping it's the latter, because I want theory to be wrong, not right, because if it's wrong there's still work left for the rest of us.
https://www.edge.org/conversation/the-en...n-39t-zero

@OP, your friend is unlikely to have gotten that from any paper, but, rather, a movie called The Principle.  Which is a Godidit™ conspiracy trash film.

Krauss, on the movie- on twitter.
Quote:For all who asked: Some clips of me apparently were mined for movie on geocentricism. So stupid does disservice to word nonsense. Ignore it.

He elaborates in Slate

Quote:The notion that anyone in the 21st century could take seriously the notion that the sun orbits the Earth, or that the Earth is the center of the universe, is almost unbelievable. I say almost, because one of the trials and tribulations of being a scientist with some element of popular celebrity is that I get bombarded regularly by all sorts of claims, and have become painfully aware that ideas as old as the notion that the Earth is flat never seem to die out completely.

Kate Mulgrew (of Captain Janeway fame) on the same movie, in which she also stars.
Quote:I understand there has been some controversy about my participation in a documentary called THE PRINCIPLE. Let me assure everyone that I completely agree with the eminent physicist Lawrence Krauss, who was himself misrepresented in the film, and who has written a succinct rebuttal in SLATE. I am not a geocentrist, nor am I in any way a proponent of geocentrism. More importantly, I do not subscribe to anything Robert Sungenis has written regarding science and history and, had I known of his involvement, would most certainly have avoided this documentary. I was a voice for hire, and a misinformed one, at that. I apologize for any confusion that my voice on this trailer may have caused. Kate Mulgrew

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Principle
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Supposed Int design proof - by Hammok Man - July 28, 2017 at 5:20 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Silver - July 28, 2017 at 5:27 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by vorlon13 - July 28, 2017 at 5:29 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Brian37 - July 28, 2017 at 5:37 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Brian37 - July 28, 2017 at 5:32 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - July 28, 2017 at 5:36 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Hammok Man - July 28, 2017 at 9:30 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Jesster - July 28, 2017 at 9:38 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Brian37 - July 29, 2017 at 9:36 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 29, 2017 at 10:11 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Rhondazvous - July 31, 2017 at 6:43 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 28, 2017 at 9:33 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by brewer - July 28, 2017 at 9:39 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Hammok Man - July 28, 2017 at 10:57 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 28, 2017 at 11:08 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 1:12 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Jesster - July 29, 2017 at 1:14 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 1:34 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 29, 2017 at 1:18 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astreja - July 29, 2017 at 1:54 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 2:07 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astreja - July 30, 2017 at 12:35 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 30, 2017 at 2:26 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by The Grand Nudger - July 29, 2017 at 9:00 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 9:18 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 2:22 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Minimalist - July 29, 2017 at 2:35 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)