Plagiarism in the NT

[The Grand Nudger]

I'm telling you that the only evidence available to be pointed to in the source you linked...does not support or argue for the case made in the source you linked.  My evidence, dipshit, is your own damned link.  The author buried this deceit in a mountain of mythical irrelevancy..but, I guess..that's one way to con a mark, huh?

If you need evidence outside of your link..look no further than this thread.  We don;t find much in the way of remains of those that had been crucified - even when it would be expected.  What we do find are credulous imbeciles who, 2k years after this supposed fact, are willing to believe absolutely anything that they think conforms to their fairy tales, and no shortage of people willing to spin elaborate lies to provide the product they desperately want.

So just to clarify your evidence is the testimony of one man... correct?  However Evan's also pointed to a lot of other testimony besides just that one citation... didn't he?

As I;ve now told you twice, it doesn;t matter what other fun bits of quote mining and mythical puffery he engaged in, because thois one example of quote mining is all the evidence in the world that even comes close - and it aint about jews getting criminals nixxed by rome down off the crux in judea.  

You may also notice, that the passage in Josephus says that this was the Jewish practice to bury the dead before sundown.  Which while it was the Roman Pilate who ordered him crucified, it was at the request of the Sanhedrin.

-and here you are, like the author, referring to fairy tales to establish history.  

 Philo also mentions that there where times where a man was taken down from the cross, and allowed to be buried (Flaccus 81.

That's not what that passage says, but okay, lol.  

As well the physical evidence of a man named Yehohanan found in an ossuary who was crucified.  This dates to the first century.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/in-a-stone-...ucifixion/

How do they know he was crucified....now ask yourself how that happened.    

Further there is Pandects (Roman Law) which allowed for it to be granted that the bodies of criminals may be returned to the families although it may not be allowed either.  (Note on this source, I could not find an online copy to verify, but a number of citations)

I can grant, that it may not have been common for the Romans to take down the body of one who was crucified.  But their is evidence, that it did occur.  Now during times of war, such as the Jewish wars, this would not likely have occurred.  Why is this so difficult to admit, that it may be true?

Not common is being generous.  It also didn't happen during times of active occupation for a person claiming to be a king of something - nor would a person be removed alive so that one might...historical (rather than magically) establish that jesus was out and about greeting his disciples a few days later.  Sure, people could steal remains away (but, um...do you wanna go that route...lol?), people could be bribed or bought back.  I'm not a fantasist like yourself, so I don't need to qualify my every statement just to shut the door on idiocy. You're holding out hope that lightning struck in every regard, I don't have time for that noise.