(July 31, 2011 at 8:34 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Quite honestly, I'd prefer that the cross be moved to St. Paul's Chapel that's right near the WTC site and is heavily connected to the aftermath of the attacks. It's close to the site and it's in a place where it would be fitting.
And if I'm being quite honest: save the money on the pointless monument. You want a nice cheap little marker? Use a small cinder block.
And even then: what the fuck is the point of a monument to an attack? I can understand someone maybe respecting a great man of science or the leader who pulled their nation through the war... but to respect a terrorist attack by firstly recognizing it and then having the fucking idiocy to dramatize it... only to put a monument there to mark what happened for as long as possible?
Sounds to me like the terrorists won.
What fits in that place is not a monument: it is a tall building.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day