My goodness. Would that i had been here from the start for now i would spend far too long hopping to back to previous posts to pose and respond to things i find pertinant. So just to throw my hat into the ring sort of speak, i would like to say that much respect should be given to Pip for sticking to his guns and attempting to maintain posture and EVF for creating\encouraging legitamte discussion.
So for now i'd like to say that i have read the "russel's teapot" story it seemed rather garbled in a sense to me. so my question then is. While there is no solid proof, that you accept, for the exsistence of god, What specific proof do you have that there is no god? Now i do not mean the fact that we can prove the things in our world are made by specific processes (evolution for one, as a rudementary example). What i mean is how can you argue that something else didnt design the process of evolution?
And as small point to finish: Would the process of evolution slowing changing us, not suggest that indeed there is a plan. Which then would beg the question who designed/created the plan?
-Lotus
"Life Is Short - Death Is A Transition"
So for now i'd like to say that i have read the "russel's teapot" story it seemed rather garbled in a sense to me. so my question then is. While there is no solid proof, that you accept, for the exsistence of god, What specific proof do you have that there is no god? Now i do not mean the fact that we can prove the things in our world are made by specific processes (evolution for one, as a rudementary example). What i mean is how can you argue that something else didnt design the process of evolution?
And as small point to finish: Would the process of evolution slowing changing us, not suggest that indeed there is a plan. Which then would beg the question who designed/created the plan?
-Lotus
"Life Is Short - Death Is A Transition"
