Why disbelievers believe? They believe in so called “God of the gaps”.

[theBorg]

"God of the gaps" is a term used to describe observations of theological perspectives in which gaps in scientific knowledge are taken to be evidence or proof of God's existence... how wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. (Wikipedia 2016).

Theorem: it is wiser to let the God in the ship's hold gap, until the secular science will find the secular stop-gap. Proof: "it is just obvious." More is here:

But while the "white spot" or the “gap” (the gap in the secular view of the world) is not closed by the secular science, let the gap be closed by the True God Himself. If is needed, the God will make the additional room for the secular science. But why to tear the God from all the white spots? Otherwise our society (like a ship) will sink in the "sin-deeds-sea" due to huge ugly holes in the knowledge!

[Iroscato]

Remember kids: don't do drugs.

[LastPoet]

*yawn* boooring.

Any takers?

[Jesster]

I love how this accurately depicts how little this guy knows about what the god of the gaps argument actually is and why it's such a terrible stance. It's adorable, though a bit sad.

Time to move on.

[purplepurpose]

If you view religion from emotional point of view, people simply cannot accept the position of a eternal servant. Its unnatural or painful. Evidence doesnt matter.

[rado84]

Another dumb topic by a person who obviously doesn't understand the meaning of the word "disbelieve".

[CapnAwesome]

God of the gaps is a silly argument and especially silly since the gaps slowly get filled in, we see more and more filled in all the time. In this day and age we literally see them filled in as we go.

[Brian37]

"God of the gaps" is a term used to describe observations of theological perspectives in which gaps in scientific knowledge are taken to be evidence or proof of God's existence... how wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. (Wikipedia 2016).

Theorem: it is wiser to let the God in the ship's hold gap, until the secular science will find the secular stop-gap. Proof: "it is just obvious." More is here:

But while the "white spot" or the “gap” (the gap in the secular view of the world) is not closed by the secular science, let the gap be closed by the True God Himself. If is needed, the God will make the additional room for the secular science. But why to tear the God from all the white spots? Otherwise our society (like a ship) will sink in the "sin-deeds-sea" due to huge ugly holes in the knowledge!

WVDVDORIOIOENVNFDOPVNREPOPANNRNNININIGRENIGNIEOGREGRENOIGEIINGREENGRNNIGIORENIN......and......eioonrean[raq4reavenrenrennrerrea89er, and don't forget.....wewhreiwpewnenpepenpbgreurprerepereere.......

Even Seri doesn't have a gibberish translator.

[Ben Davis]

"God of the gaps" is a term used to describe observations of theological perspectives in which gaps in scientific knowledge are taken to be evidence or proof of God's existence... how wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. (Wikipedia 2016).

That's right.

Theorem: it is wiser to let the God in the ship's hold gap, until the secular science will find the secular stop-gap. Proof: "it is just obvious." More is here:

This is not a theorem and "it's just obvious" isn't any sort of rational justification, even if it were!

But while the "white spot" or the “gap” (the gap in the secular view of the world) is not closed by the secular science, let the gap be closed by the True God Himself.

But since you seem to think that True God™ is a bacterium or some sort of proto-life form somewhere in the universe, how can that be an answer to anything?

If is needed, the God will make the additional room for the secular science. But why to tear the God from all the white spots? Otherwise our society (like a ship) will sink in the "sin-deeds-sea" due to huge ugly holes in the knowledge!

Because not only it is not the right answer (certainly not according to your 'definition' of god) but the practice of pretending that we know what the answer is, when we clearly don't, is an obstacle to investigation of the real answers.

In an nutshell, saying 'goddidit' is laziness, ignorance or a deliberate lie. Which fits you?

[LadyForCamus]

Still at it I see. Thanks for this though:

"Proof: it is just obvious."

I needed a good laugh this morning. ?