Why are atheists such beta cucks for islamism?

[CapnAwesome]

A beta is actually the wolf that takes over a pack after an alpha. It's the second most powerful wolf in a pack. An omega male is a submission male in a wolf pack. [...]

No, not really. It's an outdated view of wolves, that's become fashionable among insecure macho-posers, as a form of feeble justification for being c*nts.

Outmoded notion of the alpha wolf
The concept of the alpha wolf is well ingrained in the popular wolf literature at least partly because of my book "The Wolf: Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species," written in 1968, published in 1970, republished in paperback in 1981, and currently still in print, despite my numerous pleas to the publisher to stop publishing it. Although most of the book's info is still accurate, much is outdated. We have learned more about wolves in the last 40 years then in all of previous history.

One of the outdated pieces of information is the concept of the alpha wolf. "Alpha" implies competing with others and becoming top dog by winning a contest or battle. However, most wolves who lead packs achieved their position simply by mating and producing pups, which then became their pack. In other words they are merely breeders, or parents, and that's all we call them today, the "breeding male," "breeding female," or "male parent," "female parent," or the "adult male" or "adult female." In the rare packs that include more than one breeding animal, the "dominant breeder" can be called that, and any breeding daughter can be called a "subordinate breeder."

For details, see http://www.wolf.org/wp-content/uploads/2...nglish.pdf and http://www.wolf.org/wp-content/uploads/2...ership.pdf

None of that really contradicts what I said, that a beta male is not a submissive male, but rather the next in line to be alpha male when the alpha dies. Actually it rather just agrees with what I said, which is that the terms are not very well understood at large.