RE: A contradiction in the liberal view of gender
August 22, 2017 at 2:19 am
(This post was last modified: August 22, 2017 at 2:27 am by paulpablo.)
The concept of what you said made sense, I had to guess what the concept was because of how badly the sentence was structured.
The way I see the liberal view point of gender is that there's what you identify as being.
And there's your biological sex.
And there's gender roles, some gender roles are general biological tendencies and some are imposed by society.
Transgenders are people who identify as being different to whatever biological sex they are born as.
I know there's probably some extreme liberals who believe every gender role is imposed by society rather than being a biological tendency, and biological sex doesn't exist which is something I would argue against.
But as for the rest of what I mentioned I don't really see a contradiction but maybe I haven't grasped what you're saying properly.
The way I see the liberal view point of gender is that there's what you identify as being.
And there's your biological sex.
And there's gender roles, some gender roles are general biological tendencies and some are imposed by society.
Transgenders are people who identify as being different to whatever biological sex they are born as.
I know there's probably some extreme liberals who believe every gender role is imposed by society rather than being a biological tendency, and biological sex doesn't exist which is something I would argue against.
But as for the rest of what I mentioned I don't really see a contradiction but maybe I haven't grasped what you're saying properly.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
