I chose not bleive in things that can't be proven.
To say we can't dissprove God exitence is not a good argument for that a God would exist.. Have you read about Rusells teapot by the way? Pretty explains it very well. Lack of dissporvel is not a evidencce exists.
If someone can't come with any evidence or proof of a gods extience will I not believe in such thing. You can't say there is a god without having anything to back it up.
To just belive in something doesn't prove anything and doesn't mean that there is even a possibilty of some things exitence.
Then we would all be able to believe in Rusells teapot and think that it would reasonible idea.
To say we can't dissprove God exitence is not a good argument for that a God would exist.. Have you read about Rusells teapot by the way? Pretty explains it very well. Lack of dissporvel is not a evidencce exists.
If someone can't come with any evidence or proof of a gods extience will I not believe in such thing. You can't say there is a god without having anything to back it up.
To just belive in something doesn't prove anything and doesn't mean that there is even a possibilty of some things exitence.
Then we would all be able to believe in Rusells teapot and think that it would reasonible idea.
- Science is not trying to create an answer like religion, it tries to find an answer.
