Testimony is Evidence

[The Grand Nudger]

I think that the observation of a gremlin either by myself or others (or something that fits that description) is sufficient evidence that it exists.  As to the number... I don't know if there is a absolute value (there are a number of variables), and it depends on the testimony itself, and how good it is.  If I seen it, then a couple of other people to confirm what I saw and not hallucinating; I think would be sufficient (because I can rule out lying at least in myself).  And if there isn't reason against it, a few more from testimony alone.

 
FINALLY.  I appreciate your honesty.  Eye witness testimony is enough to convince RR that gremlins exist.  I'm just gonna let that hang there...

Explains a lot.

LOL, I won;t though.

No ones talking about observations, were talking about testimony.  You tell stories about gremlins, others tell stories about gremlins.  How good is the testimony, can we determine by reference to the testimony?  Can we know that you saw it, by reference to the testimony?  Hallucinating...what?  That;s not in the testimony..that would be actual, exterior -evidence- as in, you're a person known to hallucinate.  Reason against it?  Also external to the testimony.  

You can;t even confine yourself, so why should anyone take you seriously here or on any other subject in which you insist that you are satisfied with testimony?  Your every qualifier had nothing to do with testimony and was exterior -to- testimony...instead referring to potential evidence.

The -evidence- at hand suggests that you'd rather make a complete fool out of yourself over the issue of gremlin stories...than admit this thread..and the last, and the one before, have been a farce. I can't even fathom why a person would put themselves in such a position...but even worse, after having put themselves in such a position...choose the gremlin option......? That;s some breath-takingly shameless lying-for-christ you're up to there, amigo.