(August 2, 2011 at 9:08 am)Killman Wrote: So why did she not know it was a wrong thing to break the rule UNTIL she did it?She clearly knew that it would be wrong to break the rule. There is no doubt about that. It's a stated observation in the text.
(August 2, 2011 at 9:08 am)Killman Wrote: How can she obey god's word when she does not know that his words are the 'good' ones in this scenario to begin with?She doesn't know if they're good or evil, they are just the rules from the boss.
(August 2, 2011 at 9:08 am)Killman Wrote: Okay, lets say your loophole holds an argument.It's hardly a loophole. Just a simple observation.
(August 2, 2011 at 9:08 am)Killman Wrote: She broke a 'rule'. Thats not good or evil. Okay, who CONVINCED her to eat the fruit? The serpent. The serpent IS evil in this fairytale. She listens to the serpent and eats the fruit. WHY? Because she has no knowledge of the differences of good and evil! How is she supposed to know that this serpent is evil? She can't!She didn't have to know that the serpent was good or evil. She had full responsibility for her own actions. All she knew was that she mustn't eat the fruit. Adam bore equal responsibility. He didn't have to listen to Eve, but he did.
Having knowledge of good & evil makes no difference on your ability to do them.
(August 2, 2011 at 9:08 am)Killman Wrote: WOW I cannot believe that people fall for this idiotic bullshit.So you think this actually happenned? Or do you fail to see the purpose?
