(August 29, 2017 at 6:08 am)alpha male Wrote:(August 28, 2017 at 9:13 pm)Astonished Wrote: Well since you're so retarded you've resorted to shifting the burden of proof about the existence of your bullshit god, your judgment about what sources to trust is obviously suspect as I made an educated guess before in assuming and you've just proven it was a good assumption.
Why are you so angry?
Quote:Show me a reputable peer-reviewed journal article not generated by a biased religious-agenda-driven 'scientist' to prove that homosexuality and other gender identifying categories are all 100% a choice; until then, I'm going by the reasonable assumption that every single non-cis-gendered person on the planet is genuinely predisposed to that rather than consciously making a choice that will inevitably bring down on them so much bigoted intolerance that pieces of trash like you are responsible for.
I haven't said it's 100% a choice. The reasonable conclusion from twins studies is that some people are born with a predisposition to be gay or trans at birth, but the predisposition is relatively small and falls far short of supporting the position that people are born gay.
And for women, longitudinal studies show that change of orientation is not uncommon. For them, conscious choice does seem to be a significant factor.
The born gay paradigm was a political tool. People, including many atheists, accepted gays' non-falsifiable claim.
Accepting non-falsifiable claims is a human thing, not a theist thing.
Another example is harm from religion. There's no way to quantify the good and harm done by religion, but atheists claim that it's a net harm anyway.
I'm angry because you're an intolerant bigot who's full of shit pretending you know things you don't and give no fucks about how badly it hurts anyone. Pretty simple. Why is it theists seem to have such a difficult time grasping this concept? Must be because of the damage their dogma does to their empathy.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.