RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 29, 2017 at 10:03 am
(This post was last modified: August 29, 2017 at 10:12 am by Astonished.)
(August 29, 2017 at 9:47 am)just emjay Wrote:(August 28, 2017 at 8:15 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: The forums need an ignore function, not just for posts, so we don't have to see obscene thread titles by desprate commie sodomites.
I didn't think you'd use words like that... sodomite... I thought you were above that. Just saying I've never thought of you as a bigot... until now.
Well, the stupid little cunt just told me he was putting me on ignore for 'not contributing' to any discussion. Amazing projection of theistic inadequacy onto others around here, but what else is new? Bigot is about the nicest thing you could say about him.
If it's within the power of a creator deity to communicate with its creation directly and correct any misconceptions about its character or desires, and it does not, there are three options for why this is, and none of them are good (for the theists' side). Either the god does not care, is malevolent and wishes to watch us butcher each other over rival interpretations of it (none of which come close), or the thing doesn't exist and never did. No 'good' god is compatible with this lack of attention. Completely inexcusable and unanswerable. To cling to this god concept while fully aware of this is to admit one's own utter dishonesty.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.