RE: Testimony is Evidence
August 30, 2017 at 6:04 pm
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2017 at 6:05 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(August 30, 2017 at 5:00 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(August 30, 2017 at 4:07 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: I see. Then all you're doing is setting up a straw man by saying that the person doing the testifying has nothing to do with the testimony he or she gives. It's like saying people cannot consider the author's intent when reading a book.
The "authors intent" is external to "witness testimony". Next.
Never figured you for one to go along with Foucault. You like to make arguments of convenience don't you?