God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability

[Astonished]

[quote pid='1620573' dateline='1505483452']

---

This is why, when you get down to it, no one is a true Xtian/whatever. You have to pick a yes/no answer to EVERYTHING and always have a good, solid reason to justify it in either direction. So when the word is so inconsistent as to render this bullshit idea of absolutes completely moot, you just look like an asshole trying to argue otherwise. But then that's not even necessary for a prick like Dripschit, he seems to excel at it without needing to appeal to the bible.

As for Gullible Cretin suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect, it's actually schizophrenia in his case, so it's far worse.

Here's the thing about Christianity most of you simply do not understand. Christ dying on the cross makes it ok not to be a yes or a no on everything. When Christ died for us the bar that each person know a yes or n to everything was removed. Now the standard is come with all that you can understand. what you get wrong will be forgiven what you don't understand will be filled in. There is no set standard anymore just do you absolute best.

[/quote]
Here's the thing about reality and your dipshittery you simply don't understand, fucko. Those events NOT having happened and not being possible to have happened and being made up to cover for something else that never happened and were not possible to have happened, makes the entire thing, drumroll please, moot. Even if the morality issue is something you evade (way to undermine the whole concept of Xtian morality, by the way, retard) which gives away your whole idea as wholesale horseshit, you then lose the entire 'but which god to believe' argument because you then have zero basis to say one is more likely than any other. You negate every, abso-fucking-lutely, EVERY aspect of your entire argument, and you don't even realize it. How much dumber can you be? Whoever put this in your head should be fucking hanged.