Unfair Coin Flip

[Edwardo Piet]

Of course it's cheating. The very definition of a coin flip is being redefined. But you have to cheat because an unfair coin is by definition unfair. This is what the 'simulating it' was supposed to account for. But you can't simulate something fair using only unfairness. This is why equivocating has to be used where you completely ignore certain results and call that 'simulating a flip'. But it's clearly more equivocating than simulating.

The interesting part is the mathematics behind the why and how of how and why it's specifically H/H and T/T sequences that must be ignored. That's the interesting bit. Of course it's 100% cheating.

It's not surprising that you can create fairness if you completely ignore and discount the unfair results.

Cheating by looking up the answer on google. Are you having a stroke? Or just your normal hissy fit?

I'm always having a stroke. If you know what I mean