What is the controversy surrounding #takeaknee

[John V]

Why should he bother?  When you refuse to read it yourself, and given history, there's a huge likelyhood that you're just going to dismiss his summary.

Also - it's *really* unlikely you read all three of those reports for comprehension in the 38 minutes between the time Thump posted his sources and your response.

So again, why should he bother?

People should summarize a link, or quote the most relevant passages, precisely because people are unlikely to spend hours reading links just to respond to a post on the internet. Linking to a long web article without summarizing is a tactic to appear to be making a point without actually making one, and linking to a book is just ridiculous.

ETA:  Also, considering the last report is 124 pages I doubt you read it at all.

I went straight to the conclusion section to see if it even supported his position. It didn't, which means he probably didn't even bother reading the conclusion.