(October 6, 2017 at 10:50 pm)Hammy Wrote:(October 6, 2017 at 10:44 pm)Astonished Wrote: Wouldn't being explainable (even in the most minimal degree) usually be a requirement for existence? Otherwise how could it be confirmed to exist?
No being explainable isn't a requirement for existence
Such as? Example? And we're not talking about something that we just don't understand YET, we're talking about this eternally unknowable and unexplainable brouhaha (which begs the question, how the fuck do we know anything about it, i.e. whether it exists, if it's like that? Or how do we even know it's unexplainable or unknowable?)
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
