God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability

[Harry Nevis]

Yeah it's called peer review. It means that papers need to reach a minimum standard in order to be accepted. For example, assertions need to be backed up by evidence. A difficult concept for you I know.

If creationists could provide evidence for creation science then they  would be able to publish papers stating it. But they can't. For example I'm not employed to research artificial intelligence at the moment, and the research I do in my spare time is at odds with the predominant paradigm that most follow. Yet I still publish papers because I back it up with evidence.

What's more evolutionary science is actually useful. Not only are the theories backed up by evidence but they work in practice. This would not be the case if it was incorrect. I personally use it almost every day of my life. There has been no useful application of the belief that everything was created.

And it's only non-scientists that think that you make lots of money as a scientist.

I know scientist that make 6 figures and he is a Christian. Evolutionary science has no use because it's not true, there are no proofs at all, none. I know what peer review is and I know what dishonest peer review is. Creation scientists have given much evidence for the way they see things, it goes against what the so called reviewers believe so it's rejected.

Flouting your ignorance again. You know nothing of evolution but what dishonest christians tell you.  You may know what peer review is, but you don't understand it.  Creation science is rejected because....IT'S NOT SCIENCE.

---

You are a hypocrite.

  A hypocrite how so, what I said is true. When Christians bark back at the atheist here they are called everything in the book, you all think we are to roll over and play dead, not the way I work.

GC

One of the reasons I think you're a hypocrite is that you ignore the myriad of evidence for evolution, but blindly lap up the crap creationists squeeze out and mislabel "evidence". It's SO obvious you only accept evidence from christian sources.  You don't even explore what the evidence is saying, you just reject it.