Thoughts

[Amarok]

[/url]

[url=http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/282/1813/20151019]Extended Evolution (Royal Society) To me the most fascinating research has to do with niche construction and genetic plasticity.

EE is just a re hatch of already dealt with idea's nothing revolutionary here . And nothing that will help you push your religion into biology.

---

Or to say it another way, it is like a deleterious change in the signal to noise ratio. If you drop a letter into a puddle, the ink always smears and blurs, it never gets sharper or adds new words.

Stupid analogy . Mutations are not words on paper .

---

It's not very important to me but you probably already knew that. I just think both sides have moved beyond what the most recent science seems to be suggesting, i.e. that there is some unknown teleological component(s) to evolutionary processes. I think the ID advocates point out serious flaws in the neo-Darwin paradigm but I also don't see a clear indication of external agency directing natural selection. On the other hand, the neo-Darwinists are ignoring that the odds are so astronomically  stacked against chance that the synthesis has become untenable.

ID bullshit that's been refuted a billion times.

---

 just think both sides have moved beyond what the most recent science seems to be suggesting

Your not engaged in the latest anything . Your just repeating quackery and re- hatched bunkum .