(October 30, 2017 at 1:29 pm)emjay Wrote: I've only read up to about page three on that thread, but it looks perfectly reasonable; you can't police people's opinions so even the OP disrespects and strawman's atheists, what's new? I was more talking about the actual rules of the site; here you wouldn't get banned for strawmanning someone, so the question is, would you there? But from what I've seen so far, there were plenty of atheists having a go at him, and presumably they're still there? (ie I'll concede the point if all of them get banned by the end of that massive thread). I'd also concede the point if there was a similar thread from an atheist that was banned. But from first impressions, that looks a fairly reasonable, civil site; not what I was expecting at all... but I haven't looked further into it.
Even though I had a personal problem with the OP of that thread and the way she approaches atheists, the main point of my thread here was how the mods there were, from my perspective, wrongly policing me because of the content I had in my signature. I was always posting within the rules on the forum, but it seemed to me that they kept trying to find little silly reasons to give me warnings.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
~ Erin Hunter
