RE: "Why not a proof/Sign/indication" - challenge and various responses to it in Quran.
November 17, 2017 at 4:00 am
(November 16, 2017 at 4:08 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote:(November 16, 2017 at 2:22 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote:
So allah wants the preachers to continue humiliating themselves infront of skeptics as usual? That's really benevolent of him
No; I don't agree to many of the OPs other points; but on this topic he is spot on !
He actually based the belief he preach on the same verses I believe; so...spot on !
If angels showed, heaven came in front of our eyes, would a non-believer believe?
I don't think so. It's lack of faith in humanity. Actually; MK brought a verse about God showing the signs for humans, and God did; the recent mind blowing evolution in cosmos discovery is just an example of that; but still humans won't believe.
That's the point.
Atlas, what you take as proof or evidence can be biased, right? We tend to ignore viable explanations if they don't match our preconceived notions, and it's not just you but even the best scientific minds on this planet are susceptible to this, and that's why the need of peer review or getting others to fact-check your ideas exist. Saying someone won't believe your idea just because they are closed minded doesn't validate your idea rather it shows a lack of proper evidence on your part.
Also regarding your argument, let's say i make some assertions like
The blue sky and oceans are proof of Krishna. Thunder and lightning are irrefutable evidence for Indra, but you won't believe this evidence because you are a non-believer in Hinduism.
Do you think just because I made these assertions, Hinduism has been proved?
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack (pester tibs via pm if you need invite)