"Why not a proof/Sign/indication" - challenge and various responses to it in Quran.

[Cyberman]

Blind assumption that everybody in the jury is doing the experiment "honestly"; is a blind slack cutting in the sake of the jury's authenticity.
I know what peer review mean; and that is not what I'm presenting here.

You clearly don't know what it is or how it works, because you go on to say this despite it being explained to you:

I'm presenting that humans tend to repeat the same actions of others; so the trials and experiments get repeated despite having different judges; and that produces identical opinions; or in other words: biased opinions.

Yeah; the fundamental flaw in the scientific method is its bias towards the truth.

Scientific experiments are totally different than philosophical ones, or historical ones.
You can smell bias when the peers chosen are usually from the same field of study. I just think so many people are subject to bias in their opinion and conclusions.

Are you fucking serious? You don't think that other scientists would seize the opportunity to overturn the scholarly consensus and make themselves incredibly famous?

As I said, scientists might be biased to one position or another, but if they're doing science as opposed to simply proselytising then the scientific method is as impartial as it gets.