RE: My House Did not have a Builder (or did it?)
December 28, 2017 at 11:25 am
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2017 at 11:27 am by CapnAwesome.)
Can't people come up with their own arguments? You can find 150 year old refutations of this.
One argument that doesn't seem to get made very much with it is that it's really an argument for polytheism. Is there a complicated house that has but a single buildèr? No. Someone laid the foundation and someone else painted the paint.
That rolex? Someone mined the gold for it, someone else smelted it, someone else put together the gears and only then is there a watchmaker. The more complicated something is, the more people it takes. So a human being is more complicated than that. It would undoubtedly take many gods to make. That is really the unintentional moral of everything in that argument.
So I would assume you are probably a Hindu, right?
One argument that doesn't seem to get made very much with it is that it's really an argument for polytheism. Is there a complicated house that has but a single buildèr? No. Someone laid the foundation and someone else painted the paint.
That rolex? Someone mined the gold for it, someone else smelted it, someone else put together the gears and only then is there a watchmaker. The more complicated something is, the more people it takes. So a human being is more complicated than that. It would undoubtedly take many gods to make. That is really the unintentional moral of everything in that argument.
So I would assume you are probably a Hindu, right?
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)