RE: My House Did not have a Builder (or did it?)
January 2, 2018 at 3:45 pm
(This post was last modified: January 2, 2018 at 3:53 pm by Ravenshire.)
(January 2, 2018 at 2:58 pm)Dan Brooks Wrote:(January 1, 2018 at 10:10 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: So, you can show, scientifically, that an infant's blood is somehow different, uncorrupted, since they've never sinned?!?
Yeah, didn't think so.
Lay off the iron age voodoo bullshit, kid. It'll fuck up your brain faster than crack.
We're already in that condition, because we come from Adam, who sinned. So he passed that on to everyone. If we didn't have that condition, and then we sinned, our blood would then be corrupted. As for how it is now, we all already have corrupted blood.
I had never thought about whether or not there had been studies about the difference between babies' blood and adult blood. But apparently there have. And there are differences, but nothing that would prove the differences are due to the corruption of blood because of sin. But there have not only been studies but actual experiments done on mice, and it has been shown in mice that injecting old mice with young mice' blood, it reverses the affects of ageing, and makes them quicker and more agile, and improves their memory. So the age of the blood affects the age of the entire being. It's interesting.
But no, it doesn't prove or even indicate necessarily that sin is the reason for that. It just shows that there is an actual difference.
Nice backtracking. Your words indicated that our blood becomes corrupt when we sin. So which is it? You gonna provide evidence for your actual claim or are you going to stick with innocents being guilty because of something their alleged forbear did,
(January 2, 2018 at 3:19 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(January 2, 2018 at 2:58 pm)Dan Brooks Wrote: We're already in that condition, because we come from Adam, who sinned. So he passed that on to everyone. If we didn't have that condition, and then we sinned, our blood would then be corrupted. As for how it is now, we all already have corrupted blood.
I had never thought about whether or not there had been studies about the difference between babies' blood and adult blood. But apparently there have. And there are differences, but nothing that would prove the differences are due to the corruption of blood because of sin. But there have not only been studies but actual experiments done on mice, and it has been shown in mice that injecting old mice with young mice' blood, it reverses the affects of ageing, and makes them quicker and more agile, and improves their memory. So the age of the blood affects the age of the entire being. It's interesting.
But no, it doesn't prove or even indicate necessarily that sin is the reason for that. It just shows that there is an actual difference.
The part I bolded and most of this is like a shared understanding between Christians. For the rest of us that means nothing. Considering your audience you might want to try addressing those who will read what you're writing here, rather than someone who shares all those insider stories. (On the other hand, you will find a great number of atheists who know the bible far better than you would imagine. I'm just not one of them and have no interest in any of it.)
It continually blows my mind that the courts can figure out that I'm not guilty of the crimes of my father, but the thumpers keep wanting me to believe that I'm guilty by association because my alleged great-great-great-great-great-and-so-on-grand-pappy ate some fruit.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.