RE: New Evidence for Multiverse from Planck Scientist
January 10, 2018 at 10:48 am
(This post was last modified: January 10, 2018 at 11:29 am by Whateverist.)
(January 10, 2018 at 6:29 am)Agnosty Wrote:(January 9, 2018 at 2:12 am)Whateverist Wrote: When I responded to the part about a flash of light bookended by endless darkness, the me's I had in mind which would replace my 'light' weren't narrowly this me. I was thinking just me's appropriate to their starting conditions. So essentially me's in potential, but that's enough. What difference does it make? I wouldn't want a lot of memories and biases from a bunch of dead people in the past clogging up my experience, no one to come would want that from me.It seems you're describing the player of all the parts as being you. And I agree. All the "you's" that arise, "you" will play their parts.
I think me's makes more sense than you's, as they will all have a 'me' kind of experience, something that is no more linked to myself than to anyone else living. I just don't think it is important to find a unique eternal pathway for every human being, nor do I think there is one .. well apart from our collective role in the web of life. But there is no more "I" in "web" than there is in "team".
It would be like following the path of one raindrop for years. Its parts will be spread through other raindrops in future iterations. It just doesn't matter.
