(January 21, 2018 at 8:54 am)Grandizer Wrote:(January 21, 2018 at 7:19 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: When I personally judge the design; consistency is what impresses me.
This is what to expect in an existence that is logical. If existence were not logical, it wouldn't make sense to exist. So it's not just that something has to exist, but something logical has to exist.
It's not an indicator of design. You see design because of the way you are wired, but it doesn't mean intended cosmic design is a thing.
Logic has different types; if something "makes sense", then something is "logical"; the "sense" though differs from one definition to the other.
There is no criteria to validate the best logical model. Something might exist under different "logical approaches" that we know nothing about.
Quote:Quote: Wrote:Science's accuracy in measuring the variables around us, is not an indication that it will be accurate when applied to "different" variable types. Quantum Mechanics are my example: physical laws failed in that dimension.
I don't know about whether physical laws do fail at the quantum level. I think it's more like there's a gap in knowledge there, which is better left to the proper scientists to fill using the proper means to attain reasonable math-based or evidence-based knowledge.
Particles proved to exist in two locations at the same time at a quantum level.
