Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.

[Shell B]

Should be made clear that the guy didn't post actual pedophilic content, as in abuse porn or anything like that. Just feel like it should be noted that if that were the case, the police would be consulted. I also personally don't feel like it should be ambiguous since he's not here to defend himself. It was a creepy video, but I honestly can't even tell what's happening in it nor is there any nudity. It was also a cartoon. I have no idea if purp is any kind of pedo, but I don't think we should assume that or say that he is, per the same rule that was used to temp-ban him.

---

Can anyone honestly say they can tell what was happening in the video? Seriously, it had creeptastic vibes, but it's anime. That shit's hard to understand.