(February 10, 2018 at 11:38 pm)Grandizer Wrote:(February 10, 2018 at 10:59 pm)SteveII Wrote: Not at all. You are missing what "possible world" semantics means. A "possible world" is the way reality could have been. While the actual world is a possible world, all the rest of them are just conceptions used to iron out logical questions. If you are going to discuss philosophy and metaphysics, you MUST become acquainted and know how to use the terms. Read this if you need to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possible_world
To be clear, there is only one actual world--the one we see.
Why do you always do this thing where you think you know it all, and people disagreeing with you are dumb? You're not even addressing what I'm asking you here.
If the abstract cannot exist without concrete worlds/realities, actual or not, then how can there be a possibly actual world (reality) where only the abstract exist?
Well, for an atheist, you would be claiming that abstract objects exist independent of any world. As a theist, I would just say that these abstract objects are grounded in God. Either way, you don't need a concrete world for them to exist.
