(February 11, 2018 at 9:29 am)SteveII Wrote:(February 11, 2018 at 9:15 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: I think Matt D. brings up a point worth noting about the argument from contingency by noting the distinction between causal contingency and sustained contingency. The argument itself is not an argument for sustained contingency...Not that that is its only problem Ofc. We have the Bible to fill in those blanks I guess. 😏
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l6esL6yz52Q
I can't listen to 35 minutes waiting for one point. Do you have a timestamp with what you are talking about?
It comes up in the first five minutes...
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
