RE: God is so quiet
February 11, 2018 at 5:03 pm
(This post was last modified: February 11, 2018 at 5:04 pm by GrandizerII.)
(February 11, 2018 at 4:58 pm)pocaracas Wrote: I mean that their arguments establishes that a purely necessary thing must exist and only then do they call it god. Then they work the other way and fill up this god with a bunch of features.
I see what you mean, and maybe this is so in some arguments. But with the modal ontological one, they have to define God as necessary before making the argument. Otherwise, it would be even more useless than it already is.
Quote:(February 11, 2018 at 4:40 pm)Grandizer Wrote: You mean the B-theory of time? I agree.
No, I don't mean that.... but I'd put that in as one of those weird features... at least a possible one.
Ok, I'm curious now. I thought you were referring to that because it fits what you were describing. Einsteinian Relativity implies the B-theory of time. I'm not that sophisticated when it comes to physics.
