(March 16, 2018 at 10:49 am)Drich Wrote:(March 14, 2018 at 9:37 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: You didn't understand the unabridged version, so I strongly doubt you would understand a condensed version. With regard to your objections, I'm reminded of the remark that, "That is not only not right; it is not even wrong." Regardless, I'm not feeling particularly well, so I'm going to defer a longer response to another time. I would only comment that in your rush to refute my position, you failed to first acquire an adequate grasp of what I was saying.
...Or maybe your view of Christianity is wrong, and you are trying to understand what I said through your view or rather what you think I should have said to you filtered through your lens of a 'moral God'/what makes this god's morality better than anyone else..
When in truth morality, right/wrong has nothing to do with God, as God does not hold us to a standard of 'morality' to judge us worthy. He hold Christ to that standard as we put on Christ's righteousness in place of our own.
Your whole God view is based on a jeudeo/catholic understanding of a works/Deeds based God. Where obedience and works yield righteousness. Again not the case. If you understood this to be not the case you would not have sought to rectify the morality of God over that of any other standard. As God's law/morality only serves one purpose, and that is to point out sin in the unrepentant, and to judge them. Once one repents the law becomes moot to us as t is moot to Christ.
The points I was making are unrelated to the themes you are focusing on. That's how I know you didn't understand what I wrote.