RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 12:32 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 12:38 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 16, 2018 at 11:27 pm)Mechaghostman2 Wrote:(March 16, 2018 at 5:19 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: "Kind" is very much defined, it's synonymous with sort or species.
So when the ringed salamander creates a new species every few months, is that evidence of one kind turning into another?
What determines their inability to produce offspring?
(March 16, 2018 at 5:22 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Is it, though?*Emphasis mine*
What "kind" do the following belong to;
1. Tiger
2. St. Augustine Grass
3. Mouse
4. Tobacco
5. Wolf
6. Psilocybe Cubensis
7. Great White Shark
8. Bacillus Thuringiensis
9. Live Oak
10. Potato
11. Orangutan
12. Hyena
13. Mackeral
14. Housecat
15. Corn
16. Beagle
17. Humans
18. Stingray
19. Fruit Bat
20. Eggplant
21. Lemur
22. Mycobacterium Avium
23. Agaricus Bisporus
24. Chestnut
25. Horsetail Fern
Our answers to the above would demonstrate whether or not "kind" was synonymous with "species" or "sort" (whatever that's supposed to be).
No, any dictionary or thesaurus will tell you that "kind" is synonymous with "species" or "sort"...
