Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 14, 2024, 5:29 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
#16
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 7:39 pm)chimp3 Wrote: So, chimps, humans, raccoons, horses, pigs, and rabbits have fur, live birth, feed their young with milk. Does this make them a "kind"?

No dummy, the definition clearly stated a class of INDIVIDUALS having some common characteristics or qualities; DISTINCT sort or kind.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/distinct
Quote:distinct

1. distinguished as not being the same; not identical; separate

The creatures you mentioned are clearly distinct from one another.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition - by Huggy Bear - March 17, 2018 at 8:16 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  This is Kind of Sad Minimalist 0 417 August 19, 2017 at 9:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Different kind of Traffic Stop Minimalist 3 1221 May 13, 2015 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
Tongue Stuff Creationist Say Cholley71 0 724 April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am
Last Post: Cholley71
  Every Debate With A Creationist.... Minimalist 4 2680 September 13, 2011 at 7:43 am
Last Post: searchingforanswers
  Funny pics of all kind Ace Otana 74 53123 September 16, 2010 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Eilonnwy
  Top 10 creationist arguments Dotard 4 1269 February 10, 2010 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Pippy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)