RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:52 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 8:53 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 17, 2018 at 8:48 pm)chimp3 Wrote:(March 17, 2018 at 8:43 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Well, looks like we have another candidate for the hall of shame.
If you really knew me this would be an appropriate response. But, since we are talking about mammalian characteristics and not my lifelong sexual practices, I do not see how shame applies!
You should be embarrassed by your statement of "no mammal lays eggs" alone...
(March 17, 2018 at 8:50 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:Well, looks like we have another candidate for the hall of shame.Nope pointing out all mammals are similar does not belong in the hall of shame . because as i already showed in my own comment they still have more in common then not .
Are all mammals identical?