Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 22, 2025, 11:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
#27
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 8:48 pm)chimp3 Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 8:43 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Well, looks like we have another candidate for the hall of shame.

If you really knew me this would be an appropriate response. But, since we are talking about mammalian characteristics and not my lifelong sexual practices, I do not see how shame applies!

You should be embarrassed by your statement of "no mammal lays eggs" alone...

(March 17, 2018 at 8:50 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:
Quote:Well, looks like we have another candidate for the hall of shame.
Nope pointing out all mammals are similar does not belong in the hall of shame .  because as i already showed in my own comment they  still have more in common then not .

Are all mammals identical?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition - by Huggy Bear - March 17, 2018 at 8:52 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  This is Kind of Sad Minimalist 0 507 August 19, 2017 at 9:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Different kind of Traffic Stop Minimalist 3 1473 May 13, 2015 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
Tongue Stuff Creationist Say Cholley71 0 860 April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am
Last Post: Cholley71
  Every Debate With A Creationist.... Minimalist 4 3033 September 13, 2011 at 7:43 am
Last Post: searchingforanswers
  Funny pics of all kind Ace Otana 74 57440 September 16, 2010 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Eilonnwy
  Top 10 creationist arguments Dotard 4 1606 February 10, 2010 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Pippy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)