Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition

[Amarok]

The term 'biology' didn't exist until the early 19th century muppet... the scripture existed long before that. I explained how it classified a species, if you don't like it, tough.

Just because it defined kind as something first does not make its definition correct  or valid Idiot  . Yes you did and it's an invalid  definition in biology which is what were discussing . Yes i don't like it because it's wrong naive and silly which is why people in the 19th century and beyond it's not used and why modern taxonomy is . Thus Kinds is reduced to a non terminology in regards to modern biology . And if  you don't like that tough.

Look you mental midget, the OP stated in the title of this thread and in his post that 'kind' is not defined.

This is false because it is clearly defined in the dictionary as being synonymous with 'species', and therefore having the same definition. 

This has nothing to do with the bible.

Got it?

Actually no because kind is not a valid definition for species in biology. Which is why it's not used in biology . Thus it remains undefined and only retains validity in the imaginations of creationists . Dumbass .

---

What species means in biology. Nowhere does the term kind hold validity . And of course in terms of extent biology it is even less credible. And no common dictionary will change that.