RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 18, 2018 at 10:48 pm
(This post was last modified: March 18, 2018 at 10:51 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 18, 2018 at 9:30 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Actually no because kind is not a valid definition for species in biology. Which is why it's not used in biology . Thus it remains undefined and only retains validity in the imaginations of creationists . Dumbass .
https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/t...iology/v-1
Quote:The issue of natural kinds in biology is important because such kinds serve as a basis for prediction and explanation in science. Furthermore, biological kinds are taken to be real categories in nature. For these reasons, the topic of natural kinds in biology is of special interest to the philosophy of science and metaphysics.
You were saying?
That goes for your butt boi Anomalocaris also.
