Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 2:58 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Media v
Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
Amarok Offline
The Unseen
*****
Religious Views: Non believer
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation: 43
#79
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 18, 2018 at 11:28 pm
Your still wrong Huggy . Kind is not a valid term in modern taxonomy . And kind as species as defined by the dictionary is not a valid term in biology either . 

[Image: 103778-004-A67721FB.jpg]
What species means in science your is not a valid term in that regard 

Tough luck Dodgy
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Media v
Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition

Messages In This Thread
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition - by Amarok - March 18, 2018 at 11:28 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  This is Kind of Sad Minimalist 0 450 August 19, 2017 at 9:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Different kind of Traffic Stop Minimalist 3 1330 May 13, 2015 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
Tongue Stuff Creationist Say Cholley71 0 779 April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am
Last Post: Cholley71
  Every Debate With A Creationist.... Minimalist 4 2820 September 13, 2011 at 7:43 am
Last Post: searchingforanswers
  Funny pics of all kind Ace Otana 74 54861 September 16, 2010 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Eilonnwy
  Top 10 creationist arguments Dotard 4 1403 February 10, 2010 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Pippy



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)