RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 19, 2018 at 1:05 am
(This post was last modified: March 19, 2018 at 1:16 am by Amarok.)
Of course huggy is going to try and save himself by pointing out that that species is considered (with a great deal of debate ) As a natural kind in the philosophy of science(so are many categories in taxonomy) . Too bad this only means it defines the difference between natural classifications and artificial classifications . And does not mean that kind is like, Order, Genus or even Species itself in taxonomy . and sure as hell clashes with his dictionary definition that puts higher taxonomic orders under species. He may even try an essentialist argument for species. This will still fail him as it's still classifier used . So Huggy misusing words again .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb