Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 27, 2024, 5:33 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
#82
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
Of course huggy is going to try and save himself by pointing out that that species is considered (with a great deal of debate ) As a  natural kind in the philosophy of science(so are many categories in taxonomy)  . Too bad this only means it defines the difference between  natural classifications  and artificial classifications .  And does not mean that kind is like, Order, Genus or even Species itself in taxonomy . and sure as hell clashes with his dictionary definition that puts higher taxonomic orders under species. He may even try an essentialist argument for species. This will still fail him as it's still classifier used . So Huggy misusing words again .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition - by Amarok - March 19, 2018 at 1:05 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  This is Kind of Sad Minimalist 0 449 August 19, 2017 at 9:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Different kind of Traffic Stop Minimalist 3 1329 May 13, 2015 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
Tongue Stuff Creationist Say Cholley71 0 778 April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am
Last Post: Cholley71
  Every Debate With A Creationist.... Minimalist 4 2814 September 13, 2011 at 7:43 am
Last Post: searchingforanswers
  Funny pics of all kind Ace Otana 74 54849 September 16, 2010 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Eilonnwy
  Top 10 creationist arguments Dotard 4 1389 February 10, 2010 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Pippy



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)