Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 12:13 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Berkeley's argument for the existence of God
#85
RE: Berkeley's argument for the existence of God
Light of an interval of wavelengths is called 'blue' because when we see such light, we get the experience of seeing blue. The same for red, yellow, green, etc.

The wavelength (equivalently, the frequency) is a property of light (along with direction of travel) which is directly related to the energy of the photons carrying that light.

We have the experience of blue light because in our eyes, there are pigmented cells that send signals to our brains when exposed to light. The specific pattern of signals is interpreted by our brains as color (as well as other things, like direction, etc). So, light with a certain range of wavelengths produces certain types of signals because it stimulated certain cones in our retinas. That sends signals through the optic nerve to the occipital region of the brain where it is interpreted as a color: the color blue.

Now, most times when we see things, the eyes respond to a variety of wavelengths at the same time, so we see a mixture via the signals sent to the brain. But it is possible for two different *physical* situations to give the same signals, so we see them as the same color. They can be distinguished physically by their electromagnetic properties, but we do not 'see' a difference.

This happens more dramatically for color blind people who lack one type of cone, so see the same color when most of us see different colors (specifics depend on the type of cone lost). In this sense, most mammals (such as dogs) are color blind: they only have two (or one) type of cone.

But certain birds have MORE than three types of cone, so they can distinguish colors that we cannot. The signals going to their brains carry information from four or more types of cone, so can distinguish physical situations that we cannot.

So it is essentially certain that there will be two 'colors' that we see as *absolutely the same (not just different shades) that a duck, for example, would see as different.

Light is a physical process. The experience of light is determined by what information gets transferred to our brains to be processed.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Berkeley's argument for the existence of God - by polymath257 - March 29, 2018 at 5:29 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 1484 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: CuriosityBob
  Proving the Existence of a First Cause Muhammad Rizvi 3 935 June 23, 2023 at 5:50 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The existence of God smithd 314 28359 November 23, 2022 at 10:44 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridican Argument for the Existence of God The Veridican 14 2545 January 16, 2022 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: brewer
  A 'proof' of God's existence - free will mrj 54 8534 August 9, 2020 at 10:25 am
Last Post: Sal
  Best arguments for or against God's existence mcc1789 22 3603 May 22, 2019 at 9:16 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Argument Against God's Existence From God's Imperfect Choice Edwardo Piet 53 10044 June 4, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Objective Moral Values Argument AGAINST The Existence Of God Edwardo Piet 58 15768 May 2, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency datc 386 53136 December 1, 2017 at 2:07 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  A good argument for God's existence (long but worth it) Mystic 179 38015 October 26, 2017 at 1:51 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)