Arguments for God in Quran.

[stretch3172]

No, the conclusion follows because premise 1 states that something exists and premise 2 states that god needs to exist for that itself to exist therefore the conclusion does follow.

The problem is the premises are bullshit and MK doesn't seem to comprehend that you can make a perfectly valid argument for the existence of anything but without soundness it's doomed.

Agreed. Just for fun, here's the proof: 

To prove: G (God exists).                                             

1. M (Moral guidance exists) [Assumption]                                                   
2. M↔G [Assumption]
3. G [lines 1-2, Biconditional Elimination].

The second premise is the biggest obstacle.