RE: Arguments for God in Quran.
April 2, 2018 at 9:19 pm
(This post was last modified: April 2, 2018 at 9:23 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
MK, do I need to make the following any more obvious?
This was your argument:
Both your premises lack any support. It's a valid argument but not sound. So, I can replace the bolded part and keep the same structure like this:
1. There is such a thing as real magic
2. The real magic would be magic from wizards or otherwise impossible.
3. Therefore wizards exist.
And yet you still think your argument is proof?
In the same way that it's rational to ask "What proof is there of this real magic?" And "Why must the magic be from real wizards or otherwise impossible?" it's rational to ask "What proof is there of this real guidance?" And "Why must the guidance be from God or otherwise impossible?"
You need to at least try to support your premises with further arguments, otherwise how is it proof?
This was your argument:
(April 2, 2018 at 12:43 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: 1. There is such a thing as real guidance
2. The real guidance would be guidance from God or otherwise impossible.
3. Therefore God exists.
Both your premises lack any support. It's a valid argument but not sound. So, I can replace the bolded part and keep the same structure like this:
1. There is such a thing as real magic
2. The real magic would be magic from wizards or otherwise impossible.
3. Therefore wizards exist.
And yet you still think your argument is proof?
In the same way that it's rational to ask "What proof is there of this real magic?" And "Why must the magic be from real wizards or otherwise impossible?" it's rational to ask "What proof is there of this real guidance?" And "Why must the guidance be from God or otherwise impossible?"
You need to at least try to support your premises with further arguments, otherwise how is it proof?
