The best explanation to date is that the Shroud is a painting, not a burial cloth, and dates from the Middle Ages, not the 1st century. No burst of ultraviolet light required.
Boru
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 10, 2025, 11:43 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Shroud of Turin more legit after research?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Bombardier Challenger 604 'totaled' after A380 wake turbulence event | vorlon13 | 1 | 900 |
June 14, 2017 at 11:13 pm Last Post: Thumpalumpacus |
|
| Dr. Graham Phillips research on meditation | Little Rik | 3 | 1222 |
June 12, 2016 at 6:15 am Last Post: Lucanus |
|
| Who the hell believes this is a legit study I ask? | Mystical | 6 | 1864 |
May 7, 2014 at 3:09 am Last Post: Justtristo |
|
| Research shows radiometric dating still reliable (again) | orogenicman | 7 | 3722 |
November 16, 2010 at 6:14 pm Last Post: orogenicman |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
