Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 30, 2024, 1:57 am
Atheist Forums › Science › Physical Sciences v
Shroud of Turin more legit after research?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Shroud of Turin more legit after research?
Fireball Offline
Refractory Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 9414
Threads: 20
Joined: September 8, 2015
Reputation: 79
#5
RE: Shroud of Turin more legit after research?
April 7, 2018 at 9:02 pm
These people, whoever they are, do not understand laser or any other energy delivery description. The general description is in Joules, not Watts. They clearly don't know their physics. FAIL. It's been discredited by radiocarbon dating and inspection of the pigments used, many of which did not exist either in the region of the putative jeebus, or in that time period.

So, geography, time, chemistry and physics fail. Not more legit.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Physical Sciences v
Shroud of Turin more legit after research?

Messages In This Thread
RE: Shroud of Turin more legit after research? - by Fireball - April 7, 2018 at 9:02 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bombardier Challenger 604 'totaled' after A380 wake turbulence event vorlon13 1 722 June 14, 2017 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Dr. Graham Phillips research on meditation Little Rik 3 962 June 12, 2016 at 6:15 am
Last Post: Lucanus
  Who the hell believes this is a legit study I ask? Mystical 6 1461 May 7, 2014 at 3:09 am
Last Post: Justtristo
  Research shows radiometric dating still reliable (again) orogenicman 7 3093 November 16, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)