RE: Shroud of Turin more legit after research?
April 8, 2018 at 6:02 pm
(This post was last modified: April 8, 2018 at 6:06 pm by Succubus.)
(April 8, 2018 at 4:31 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Okay, do this: Look a globe. You see, perhaps, the Americas, but you don't see the Middle East. If the shroud had been wrapped about the dead Jew's head you would see the back of his head. Instead you just see the front, like looking at a globe.
The people that gen'd up that shroud thought their audience would be completely gullible, and they were right.
Nailed!
And no explanation for the lack of wraparound distortion.
And he's taller on the back than he is on the front.
And the top of his head is missing making him only ~three inches thick.
And one arm is longer than the other.
And they are both too long anyway. Try it, lay on your back and try to cover your wedding tackle with both your hands. You can't do it.
And the blood flow defies gravity.
And why is a corpse bleeding anyway?
And there is no other example of that three in one herringbone weave dating to the 1st century.
And pencils.
No wait, I mean lead, no that's not right, I mean diamond, or is it graphite? No, I mean soot. Yes that's it, soot!
I think the term I'm looking for is Carbon 14. Or is it 12?
The linen the holy beach towel is made of gasped its last breath; AD1260- 1390.
And I'm pretty sure I'll go to my grave never knowing why educated people believe this shit.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.